A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has rejected a grunt by Huawei govt Meng Wanzhou to admit additional sworn testimonies from workers of the telecom big as evidence in her extradition case.
Companion Chief Justice Heather Holmes says in a ruling launched Friday that the proposed evidence has no intention in an extradition hearing, which has a totally different mandate than a trial.
She says an extradition judge considers whether the requesting notify has supplied evidence establishing a case, nevertheless does not steal in a broader weighing of evidence or bear in mind the frequent energy of the case.
Meng is needed in the United States on fraud charges that every she and Huawei explain.
She is accused of making fallacious or misleading statements to international financial institution HSBC to the create that Huawei no longer managed skills company Skycom, when in fact it continued to perform so, putting the financial institution at threat of violating U.S. sanctions against Iran.
Whereas she rejected the sworn testimonies, Holmes provisionally allowed an authority document to be admitted into evidence topic to additional submissions.
Holmes says that evidence would possibly possibly possibly be associated fully if she is persuaded that a loss or threat of loss to HSBC would possibly possibly possibly just be regarded as too far flung because of enforcement motion against the financial institution used to be unlikely.
Meng’s arrest at Vancouver’s airport in 2018 precipitated a chilling of Canada-China family. The arrest in China of two Canadians, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, has broadly been viewed as retaliation.
Meng’s legal professionals had argued in court docket that the proposed evidence would explain that the U.S. case against Meng supplied to Canadian officials used to be “glaringly unreliable” and that HSBC workers had been well responsive to Huawei’s relationship with Skycom.
However Holmes ruled that making credibility findings is not her job.
“The proposed evidence would possibly possibly possibly perform no higher than provide an various narrative from that notify out” by the United States in its summary of the case, Holmes wrote in the decision.
“These would purchase the extradition hearing beyond its honest scope.”
This document by The Canadian Press used to be first published March 13, 2021.