Home Canada B.C. Supreme Court docket throws out Nanaimo man’s ‘atrocious’ $32-trillion lawsuit

B.C. Supreme Court docket throws out Nanaimo man’s ‘atrocious’ $32-trillion lawsuit

79
0
B.C. Supreme Court docket throws out Nanaimo man’s ‘atrocious’ $32-trillion lawsuit

VICTORIA —
A accumulate has thrown out a Nanaimo man’s lawsuit towards the Insurance Company of British Columbia (ICBC), wherein the plaintiff sought $32 trillion in damages, an viewers with the Queen and an MRI scan of his complete physique.

In step with court docket documents, Tyler Adam Chamberlin modified into as soon as hit by a automobile while riding his bicycle in Nanaimo in 2018. The motive force allegedly fled the scene and Chamberlin later filed a civil swimsuit towards B.C.’s auto insurer, claiming physical and emotional accidents.

Early Newspaper

The Nanaimo man then amended his utter, adding extra defendants, along with High Minister Justin Trudeau, B.C. Premier John Horgan and Queen Elizabeth II, among others.

Without a authorized expert, Chamberlin seemed earlier than the B.C. Supreme Court docket to argue his case on March 1. Displaying by ability of teleconference were attorneys for ICBC, the Prison expert General of Canada, the Prison expert General of British Columbia, the City of Nanaimo, Nanaimo Regional General Clinical institution and the Chief Electoral Officer of British Columbia.

Chamberlin argued his reduction must soundless encompass $32 trillion, the “reconstruction” of the RCMP, 500,000 shares in Tesla, the suspension of alternate between Canada and China, the free up of diverse labeled documents, an MRI of his complete physique and the dismantling of Transport Canada. He also sought a non-public meeting with the Queen and the “cleansing up of the swamp,” which modified into as soon as now not outlined extra clearly within the court docket documents.

In his ruling on March 5, accumulate Douglas Thompson dismissed Chamberlin’s swimsuit, pronouncing his claims were “atrocious, vexatious, and in any other case an abuse of course of.”

Chamberlin had argued that the foundations of the civil utter course of were confusing and accused workers on the court docket registry of deceptive and obstructing him.

“This case highlights the difficulties that can maybe maybe waste up in a machine that lets in litigants to file documents without a course of in discipline to display camouflage these documents to diagram sure fashioned conformity with the foundations,” Thompson wrote in his resolution. “I infer from the cloth he filed for these beneficial properties that he has been unsuccessful in acquiring appropriate advice.”

Completely one defendant is seeking charges connected to the listening to course of, but the accumulate wrote that he wouldn’t pursue charges except the defendant “chooses to press the scenario,” wherein case the accumulate would convene a teleconference to listen to Chamberlin’s submissions on the topic earlier than ruling.

Provide:
B.C. Supreme Court docket throws out Nanaimo man’s ‘atrocious’ $32-trillion lawsuit