Home Story Battle to vote: civil rights are making a comeback at the DoJ...

Battle to vote: civil rights are making a comeback at the DoJ – here’s why

142
0
Battle to vote: civil rights are making a comeback at the DoJ – here’s why

Happy Thursday,

For the four years that Donald Trump was president, the Department of Justice (DoJ) did cramped to put into label America’s federal voting rights laws – although it’s the federal agency with the most strength to get so. The department’s voting piece, which is neatly-staffed with some of the simplest voting rights attorneys in the nation, got inquisitive about almost no cases. And when they did get inquisitive about major cases in Texas and Ohio, the department chose to defend voting restrictions.

Early Newspaper

“It honest appears treasure there’s nobody home, which is tragic,” William Yeomans, a ragged DoJ official, told me back in June.

That’s position to change in a grand way.

Last month, Joe Biden nominated Vanita Gupta and Kristen Clarke, two longtime civil rights lawyers, to top positions at the justice department.

Gupta, who beforehand led the civil rights division, is Biden’s grab to be the associate attorney general, the quantity three official at the department.

Clarke is Biden’s grab to lead the civil rights division, and may maybe be the first Black woman to aid that position if she is confirmed. Over the last four years, she has been one in all the folks most raising alarm that DoJ wasn’t doing ample to put into label voting rights.

Reminder–> This Justice Dept. hasn’t brought a SINGLE case underneath the Vote casting Rights Act despite the era of widespread voter suppression that we face across the nation.

— Kristen Clarke (@KristenClarkeJD) August 19, 2019

I am not aware of a single Vote casting Rights Act case brought by this administration underneath AG Jeff Sessions.

Secy Wilbur Ross’ claim that a citizenship seek information from of on the #2020Census is mandatory to assist with VRA enforcement is as false as it’s laughable.https://t.co/jcp5gGjFh7

— Kristen Clarke (@KristenClarkeJD) March 29, 2018

Unusual priorities

Civil rights activists and ragged department officials this week said they expected more aggressive enforcement on policing and voting rights, among other problems (in a designate of how fast priorities are changing, DoJ withdrew a case challenging affirmative action insurance policies at Yale on Wednesday). There are probably a stack of cases that have been pending in the pipeline that can be near ready to file, Bryan Sells, a ragged justice department attorney, told me last week.

“You’re going to have anyone in that workplace that really wants to make obvious that the division to use the powers it has to put into label the voting rights laws,” said Ezra Rosenberg, co-director of the Vote casting Rights Challenge at the Lawyers’ Committee.

Cautious optimism

Nonetheless don’t interrogate a fast change and a new flurry of cases. The justice department picks its cases carefully, and unlike out of doors civil rights teams that usually file groundbreaking cases, the department is way more conservative. The lawyers at the justice department are also facing a federal judiciary that is way more conservative than it was four years ago after Donald Trump appointed an exceptional alternative of judges. That may maybe also affect the calculus in picking what cases to carry. Grand of the voting piece’s work has traditionally been reviewing cases submitted underneath piece five of the Vote casting Rights Act – a provision that was gutted by the US supreme court in 2013.

Restful, advocates say this may be refreshing to as soon as again have an ally in the justice department.

“It’s going to be really important and energizing and inspiring to be able to be in conversation and dialogue with folks that understand the department’s position in civil rights enforcement,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. “Nonetheless it’s also going to be inspiring, and as a matter of assets, to have the department actually get civil rights enforcement.”

Also value watching …

  • I was struck by a story in the Advocate that highlighted a library board in Lafayette, Louisiana, that rejected a $2,700 grant for voting rights programming over considerations some of the speakers had been too “far left”. The board apparently wanted the library to gather anyone to display the other facet of the subject.

  • Thirty-one counties in Florida agreed to provide Spanish-language election materials, including ballots and lawsuits as part of a settlement in a federal lawsuit. In 2018, civil rights teams sued 32 counties in the state, arguing they had been failing to note a provision of the Vote casting Rights Act that guarantees access to the ballot for non-English speakers. The teams filed the lawsuit after a surge in Puerto Rican immigrants to Florida following Hurricane Maria. The one county that didn’t settle was Charlotte county in south-west Florida.

  • Arkansas Republicans are advancing a measure that would eliminate a part of the state’s voter ID law that allows folks to vote without ID if they designate an affidavit. These affidavit provisions are usually integrated in voter ID laws as a safeguard to stop folks from being disenfranchised.

  • Missouri Republicans are also advancing a new voter ID measure, citing “questions about the 2020 election.

  • Wisconsin election officials are seeing the sky high turnout from last year’s election carry over to 2021 contests that are typically decrease profile. On election official in Madison said they’ve already despatched out 20,000 absentee ballots so far.

Source:
Battle to vote: civil rights are making a comeback at the DoJ – here’s why