A review of the environmental licences of three of Victoria’s supreme coal-fired power stations is being criticised for failing to curb their greenhouse fuel emissions.
The Environmental Security Authority on Friday presented contemporary licence prerequisites for Yallourn, Loy Yang A and Loy Yang B power stations, located in the Latrobe Valley in the disclose’s east.
Adjustments to the licences encompass limits to and ongoing monitoring of toxic pollutants such as mercury, as smartly as air discharge limits which effectively cap carbon dioxide emissions at current ranges.
Environmental groups are offended that no restrictions were placed on CO2 emissions – the fuel known to be the most well-known trigger of world warming – and there are deep concerns about the impacts of air pollution on the native Latrobe Valley community.
“Imagine reviewing the licences of the three supreme CO2 emitters in the disclose and never doing something else about those CO2 emissions,” tweeted Slash Aberle from now not-for-profit Atmosphere Victoria.
The organisation’s chief govt said the disclose’s climate felony guidelines “merely aren’t as a lot as the job and neither is our environmental regulator”.
“The three coal power stations in the Latrobe Valley are liable for more than 40 per cent of Victoria’s greenhouse fuel emissions,” Jono La Nauze said.
“The EPA is required by legislation to retain in mind climate swap when reviewing licences, but has decided now not to achieve pollution limits on the supreme source.”
The EPA hit attend, with govt director of regulatory requirements, assessments and permissioning, Tim Eaton, announcing the criticism changed into once “now not subtle” since the regulator can handiest feature throughout the confines of the legislation and to impose CO2 limits would be outside its mandate.
Mr Eaton said there changed into once no limit for CO2 emissions written into Victoria’s climate swap act.
“We achieve now not need a framework that offers us a station of numbers to impose,” he informed AAP.
Mr Eaton said particular guidelines on emissions would be legislated from disclose or federal govt, but suggested federal, as Victoria’s electrical energy grid is linked to NSW, Queensland and South Australia.
The disclose govt has previously indicated this may well well commence interim emissions reduction targets in the upcoming months, in direction of the design of find zero emissions by 2050.
The Victorian Greens on Friday slammed the government over the licence review, calling it “a failure to exhibit climate management”.
Deputy chief Ellen Sandell said it changed into once disappointing that after a three-year review, Victoria’s coal plant life don’t meet the must haves for toxic chemical substances and pollution that exist in China, Europe and the US.
“This day’s resolution is a blow for our climate and for community smartly being. Unity to all people in the Latrobe Valley, who’s born the brunt of coal pollution for a long time, and deserves so mighty better,” Ms Sandell wrote on Fb.
“In phrases of coal, the Victorian Labor govt has chosen to search after their corporate mates AGL, Alinta and Power Australia.”
In an announcement, the EPA said adjustments to the power stations’ licences had been made to offer protection to the setting and the native community.
The Australian Power Council which represents Australia’s fuel and electrical energy power outlets said the EPA’s review had been “rigorous” and criticism of an absence of motion on greenhouse fuel emissions changed into once “faulty” because carbon emissions required a national, now not disclose-based completely, response.
Owner of Loy Yang A power station, power firm AGL, informed AAP it had worked with the EPA to conform with all its environmental and regulatory obligations and said it supported “beneficial outcomes for all stakeholders”.