MONTREAL – Joe Ortona, president of the English Montreal Faculty Board (EMSB) and one in every of the principal particular person candidates of Denis Coderre’s team in Montreal’s English-speaking community, turned into as soon as fired from his field as municipal prosecutor for the City of Montreal in 2016, La Presse has realized. His departure is believed to be linked to his fight to field tickets obtained for parking initiate air a daycare centre.
President and commissioner of the EMSB for seven years, Giuseppe “Joe” Ortona is a principal figure in Montreal’s English-speaking community. He’s running for the field of municipal councillor for the Loyola district in the Côte-des-Neiges–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce borough with Coderre’s social gathering, Ensemble Montréal.
In early July, opposition leader Lionel Perez described Ortona as the “defender of English-speaking institutions.”
“The English-speaking community also desires a spokesperson,” Coderre mentioned.
Ortona made himself known to the total public by challenges to Quebec’s secularism legislation (Bill 21) and the legislation abolishing college boards (Bill 40).
Whereas seemingly riding a wave of success in most contemporary years, Ortona has a price on his CV. The worn municipal prosecutor – holding the field from January 2012 to July 2016 – turned into as soon as fired by his employer 5 years in the past.
Officially, the legal official resigned from his field. The city even equipped a letter of recommendation in September 2017. Nevertheless the “resignation” stems from a union criticism contesting the prosecutor’s dismissal in the summer season of 2016. “There turned into as soon as an agreement on a giant amount of grievances with the City of Montreal,” mentioned Jean-Nicolas Loiselle, president of the city’s attorneys’ union.
“I genuinely contain nothing to cover, I genuinely contain nothing to be ashamed of,” Ortona mentioned. If he can no longer “shield himself” by explaining the conditions of his “departure” from the city, it’s a long way because he’s jog by a confidentiality agreement. In 2017, he agreed to “flip the online page” because his business turned into as soon as going smartly after he left, he mentioned.
According to a document obtained by La Presse from the city’s just division, in February 2017, the City of Montreal awarded a $22,000 contract to an exterior agency to represent it in a criticism filed in 2016 “following the dismissal of Mr. Giuseppe Ortona.”
Reports of a parking violation
The conditions of Ortona’s dismissal are unclear, as they are no longer mentioned in any public document. Nevertheless according to a municipal source, who can no longer discuss publicly, his departure is linked, a minimum of in phase, to his court docket field on parking tickets.
“There are some in the city who saw it as a battle of interest. (…) I’m convinced that my departure from the city turned into as soon as no longer linked simplest to a straightforward parking price,” Ortona mentioned.
According to him, the tell started sooner than he challenged the parking violations. He mentioned he turned into as soon as involved in grievances concerning the process to earn tenure.
In August 2015, Ortona turned into as soon as ticketed two days in a row for parking in front of a daycare centre shut to the municipal courthouse. He parked there on a ordinary foundation for three years. Nevertheless the parking residence is reserved for folk, with a point in time of 15 minutes. “When I park there, it’s to drop off my things and attain serve instantly,” he mentioned at the time.
At his trial in July 2016, Ortona attacked the city’s municipal bylaws to contest his tickets. That month, he stopped working for the city. The legal official argued that the signal technically did not restrict parking, since it turned into as soon as a white “P” and not using a crimson bar underneath.
“Where I parked, there just just isn’t any ‘No parking’ signal,” he mentioned. The signal “Reserved for daycare” had no “just price,” he added. “The city can contain determined to position signs where parking is clearly prohibited and created exceptions,” he mentioned.
In his opinion, he had obtained a price below the corrupt article of legislation. His protection failed, on the other hand, as the cling rejected his arguments and fined him $40. On attraction, the Superior Court confirmed this resolution in September 2017.
According to Loiselle, Montreal did not contain a “clear process” at the time for the methodology staff might perchance perchance well field their personal tickets. “Mr. Ortona contested a price below the suggestions established at the time. It turned into as soon as the wild west,“ he mentioned.
Ortona maintains he turned into as soon as within his rights to field the tickets. “No topic my case, contesting a parking price just just isn’t any reason to fireside any person,” he mentioned.