Elon Musk wraps testimony in SolarCity trial after denying he set acquisition price

WILMINGTON, Del. — Tesla CEO Elon Musk wrapped up his testimony ahead of the Delaware Courtroom of Chancery on Tuesday afternoon, after spending spherical 9 hours defending his firm’s 2016 acquisition of SolarCity for $2.6 billion.

Shareholders sued Musk, alleging that Tesla’s acquisition of the list voltaic vitality installer amounted to a bailout pushed via by Musk, who modified into chairman of the board at each and each businesses at the identical time as. The shareholders also advise that Musk managed the board of Tesla, even supposing he looked as if it would recuse himself from some deal negotiations concerning SolarCity.

If Musk loses the lawsuit, he could presumably well presumably want to pay upwards of $2 billion. In this case, identified as a shareholder derivative circulate, the suit is filed by investors on behalf of an organization, rather than the individuals or funds. If the plaintiffs win, proceeds could presumably well presumably also work to Tesla and no longer to the stakeholders who introduced the suit.

Simply after questioning started on Tuesday, plaintiffs’ criminal respectable Randy Baron tried to paint a image of Musk many times going behind the board’s again to bag a deal between the two corporations started. Musk, meanwhile, insisted that every verbal replace he had spherical the deal ahead of board dialogue modified into intended to gain a paunchy image.

“Here is segment of the board route of, making distinct the board has simply information,” Musk stated, as soon as again wearing a sunless suit, white button-down shirt and sunless tie.

Musk also denied Baron’s claim that he set the price for Tesla to bag the SolarCity. Baron pointed to notes taken by a financial manual that confirmed Musk instructed the board offer $28.50 per piece for the firm. The board later settled on differ of $26.50 to $28.50.

Baron wrapped up his monstrous-examination spherical 12: 45 p.m. Musk’s criminal respectable Evan Chesler then redirected questions, trying to capture via Baron’s line of questioning and allow executive to gain more context.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Limited, who will steal the case, followed up with questions spherical timing of the deal and the significance of an integrated list voltaic product.

“As I realize, one in all the contentions in the case is the timing of this acquisition didn’t bag sense for Tesla,” Limited stated, pointing to points spherical the Mannequin X. Musk stated the points at hand, which introduced on the board to decline to pursue a SolarCity acquisition in early 2016, were solved by mid-2016. Musk stated that allowed to board to truly feel satisfied moving ahead with an acquisition.

The day’s schedule modified into modified a shrimp after it modified into compelled to decide out an unexpected recess since a member of the plaintiffs’ counsel vomited in the room.

Musk’s brother and fellow Tesla board member Kimbal Musk followed Elon Mus’s testimony, heading to the stand spherical 2: 40 p.m. Kimbal Musk joined Tesla’s board of directors in 2004. He also had invested in SolarCity.

Kimbal Musk denied that his brother is controlling of the Tesla board. He added Musk modified into finally recused from the SolarCity vote.

“In comparison to most corporations I’ve been a segment of, it be a definitely healthy board,” he stated.

The SolarCity deal modified into in an arena to help world realize Tesla’s strategic imaginative and prescient, Kimbal Musk stated, helping push the firm ahead from simply producing autos.

Tuesday’s testimony got here after a in most cases confrontational Musk spent roughly six hours on the stand on Monday.

Musk had many times denied he positioned any stress on the board to battle via with the transaction. He added that SolarCity would’ve been in an arena to steal funds on its own, and the deal didn’t quantity to a bailout. Musk stated the merger allowed Tesla to combine its battery business with Solar City’s list voltaic strength generation.

Tensions were customarily excessive between the CEO and the plaintiffs’ criminal respectable. Baron on Monday confirmed clips of Musk’s 2019 deposition, in which Musk many times known as the suit a fracture of time and stated Baron modified into a “indecent individual.”

Baron, discussing Musk’s conduct, requested if he modified into “derisive” in his deposition for any motive and stated the conduct modified into “no longer for some excellent thing about Tesla or some revenue to bag something.”

“I think you are a monstrous human being,” Musk retorted. He stated Baron modified into “mentored by criminals, then continued to be mentored by criminals.”

“This is why I create no longer appreciate you,” Musk stated. “I in truth own enormous appreciate for the court, but no longer for you, sir.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.