New South Wales farmers say they are unsure what a new koala protection coverage will mean for them.
- Farmers are unsure of what the new coverage means, nonetheless say koalas may no longer be threatened
- Green groups say the coverage will be ‘catastrophic’
The coverage will leave farmers largely exempt from extra koala protection responsibility
Details of the new coverage were unveiled yesterday after the NSW Liberals and Nationals made a deal on koala protection which offers extra concessions to farmers.
The new planning regulations will leave them largely exempt from extra koala protection responsibilities.
Rural areas will be eliminated from the new State Environment Planning Policy on koalas and near below a new code that is yet to be developed.
Land that is zoned for farming and forestry will no longer be field to the principles designed to guard koala habitat.
The changes will focal point on high-conservation areas where 95 per cent of construction occurs, and there’ll be explicit plans for koala habitat within the Tweed and Byron shires.
On the opposite hand, NSW Farmers Association president James Jackson said he was concerned about the finer detail.
“So although on the face of it it appears to be something we concur with, the stinger is exactly how the land management codes and guidelines will be affected.”
Mr Jackson said he would be searching for extra clarification on the new coverage and for extra information regarding opinions of land management codes.
“We’re desperately attempting to uncover exactly what this means and what the impact is for our farmers and their ability to behavior their trade on their land,” he said.
On the opposite hand, Mr Jackson denied that any concessions given to farmers would search koalas threatened.
Green groups have labelled the new coverage as “catastrophic”.
A forest conservation community has described the NSW Authorities’s new koala coverage as a death blow for koalas.
North East Forest Alliance president Dailan Pugh said he was concerned that it eliminated councils’ ability to regulate going online private land.
“So council can no longer require a consent for logging or prohibit it, so at the moment at some point of north-east New South Wales there’s something savor 167,000 hectares of land that’s zoned for protection where logging’s no longer allowed and there’s about another 600,000 hectares where councils require consent,” he said.
“So below what they’re proposing right here, all that protection will get eliminated.
“Across the board, councils’ ability to regulate what occurs on private land is gone in terms of logging and they’re doing that because they’re concerned that too many councils are, to expend their phrases, ‘greenie councils’ who are requiring these constraints for logging.
“I assume it’s disgusting nonetheless it’s also eradicating councils’ democratic rights, which now we have had for decades, to regulate activity on private lands.”
Speaking on the Mid North Coast this morning, The Nationals member Melinda Pavey said koalas were no longer in any extra danger.
“I speak on behalf of the farmers that I know at some point of this jam, they’re delighted after they have a koala on their property,” she said.
“Of us up the back of Kempsey, up at Willawarrin and Bellbrook, say they need they had some (koalas) and haven’t got any.”