12 years ago we published the 12 MP shootout – a head-to-head comparability of the first two telephones with 12MP cameras to hit the market, the Samsung Pixon12 (launched August 2009) and the Sony Ericsson Satio (launched October 2009). Since now we had been feeling nostalgic about a number of the excellent cameraphones of years past, we determined to aim to recreate that shootout.
In final week’s Flashback article that concerned with the Satio we famed how slim the topic of behold of the digicam is in contrast with the important thing digicam on a most modern phone (to advise nothing of the ultrawide cam). So, let’s open here – which phone matches more in the physique? Factual taking a scrutinize at the thumbnails under it’ll invent it obvious that the Pixon12 has a noticeably wider FoV (all photos had been taken from the same contrivance).
Samsung marketed the Pixon12 as having a 28mm lens (in 35mm the same), even though actually it changed into closer to 30mm. The Sony Ericsson Satio has a 35mm lens, while the stylish Xperia 1 II is mighty wider at 24mm (for the important thing cam).
That must build the Pixon12 a drawback by technique of resolved detail for the reason that same 12MP decision is stretched to quilt more of the scene. On the different hand, the Samsung digicam phone all over all all over again has the upper hand with low noise and well-defined detail. We’re also including the photos we took with the Sony Xperia 1 II for final week’s article as a benchmark of what a most modern phone can attain.
The portray Sony Ericsson Satio is extremely noisy, which drowns out the finer detail. Here is namely noticeable in the grass and in the chipped paint of the snail. Here’s a cropped in behold:
And factual out of curiosity, here’s the same chop exhibiting the Pixon12 and the Xperia 1 II. Take into accout that you simply are going to also hit the Evaluation button to the factual of portray thumbnails and take two photos to hang a more in-depth scrutinize in the gallery.
It is likely you’ll possibly well also hang seen in the snail portray that Pixon12 prefers punchier colors. The Satio does are inclined to invent colors closer to actuality. On the different hand, with both telephones the grass may maybe possibly well scrutinize pretty rather a range of in two consecutive photos.
The broader lens of the Pixon12 all all over again locations it at a drawback by technique of dynamic fluctuate – it captures more of the sky and because it changed into a cloudy day (but peaceable at some stage in summer, so rather intellectual), the telephones had their work decrease out for them. With that in thoughts, the Pixon12 has the upper hand as it resolved the clouds pretty better (and it fit more of them in the physique).
The Samsung Pixon12 has a mighty broader lens and a brighter aperture too – f/2.6 will no longer galvanize someone this present day, then all all over again it be peaceable better than Satio’s f/2.8. This allowed it to shoot at 1/15s shutter velocity, in contrast with Satio’s 1/8s, which resulted in mighty less viewed handshake in this scene.
Here’s a more in-depth scrutinize that makes the handshake evident. Really, neither of the passe telephones hang Optical Picture Stabilization (OIS) and they hang no thought methods worship image stacking that their up-to-the-minute-day descendants use to invent severely better photos even in low light.
On the different hand, here’s a moderately well-lit scene. The next one changed into shot with the flash disabled – here’s all about what the sensor can attain. Whereas telephones performed rather poorly, the Pixon12 didn’t even try.
This scene has one wall lit by a a chunk of sunless (and rather yellow) avenue light and one wall being in shadow. There are ornamental bas-relief panels on every wall and also you are going to also almost invent it out in the Satio portray. Bear a study the Xperia 1 II portray as reference for what the pattern must scrutinize worship.
Moreover image quality, we also would prefer to chat about autofocus. Both the Pixon12 and Satio are rather gradual at the handiest of instances, in the darkish they failed to salvage a spotlight lock rather most regularly. It is a known weakness of distinction detection autofocus – in the darkish it factual would no longer hang mighty to latch on to.
The Satio did attain a better job of it, but even it may maybe well possibly well no longer salvage a lock half of of the time. The Pixon12 failed as a rule. Smartly-liked half detection autofocus is more resilient by technique of focusing in the darkish. It also helps that up-to-the-minute photodiodes are method more sensitive, making the job of the AF system more uncomplicated. This has a important influence on the abilities – the stylish flagship obtained instantaneous point of curiosity lock and gave us self assurance that it’s miles factual, while the older telephones hunted for autofocus and made us effort in the occasion that they obtained it even half of factual.
You don’t gaze hundreds of xenon flashes for the time being, but they feeble to be same old on premium digicam telephones
That changed into a take a look at without a flash, but both the Pixon12 and the Satio are outfitted with xenon flashes, unlike up-to-the-minute telephones. Xenon produces a brief, very intellectual burst of sunshine, excellent for evening time photos. The Satio all over all all over again has the upper hand. To its credit, the Pixon12 captured a factual quantity of detail in the foot statue, but the Satio obtained closer to the factual coloration (the inexperienced of copper patina) and it even managed to scrutinize a number of the background.
Here’s a more in-depth scrutinize:
Really, neither can match the efficiency of a most modern phone. The Xperia didn’t actually settle on its flash for the reason that statue changed into factual next to a well-illuminated mall, which cast hundreds of sunshine on the statue. And LED flashes are no longer efficient at that distance, anyway.
Listed below are a pair of more digicam samples:
The Samsung Pixon12 and Sony Ericsson Satio had been unveiled 12 years ago and that they peaceable arrange to bewitch some first payment photos is a testament to their prowess. They had been the cream of the chop aid in 2009 and payment accordingly. The Pixon12 changed into moderately costly at €640 (€735, adjusted for inflation). The Satio also “trace a fortune” at €550 (€630 in this present day’s cash), then all all over again, it’s miles peaceable half of of what a Sony Xperia 1 II trace at launch – €1,200. And the Xperia has 12 years of progress in image sensors and image processing on its side.
It changed into relaxing revisiting a number of the absolute top-ever greats and seeing how they prolong finally this time. Nostalgia apart, here’s a huge instance of how far now we hang contrivance – we barely care to show things worship half detection autofocus for the time being, even supposing it be mighty less advanced than distinction AF.
It be factual that it’s miles predicted on up-to-the-minute telephones. As are Bottom Illumination (BSI) image sensors. We would no longer hang crucial components on the Pixon12 and Satio sensors, but seeing how Sony launched the first BSI sensor in 2009 (a 5 MP CMOS sensor), these are for lumber frontside illuminated. Again, here’s a important development in digicam produce that we bewitch as a right this present day that can possibly well no longer be imaginable by digicam telephones worship the Pixon12 and Satio convincing those that a phone can actually change your digicam.