Johnny Depp must wait to find out whether he can bring an appeal against a damning High Court ruling that he assaulted ex-wife Amber Heard and left her in “bother for her life”.
Following a three-week trial in July remaining twelve months, Mr Justice Nicol dismissed the Hollywood huge name’s libel order against the publisher of The Sun, finding that an April 2018 column calling Mr Depp a “wife beater” used to be “considerably correct”.
The mediate dominated Mr Depp, 57, assaulted Ms Heard, 34, on a dozen times and build her in “bother for her life” three conditions.
The actor is now asking the Court of Appeal to grant permission for him to topic the ruling, with the map of getting its findings overturned and a retrial ordered.
Neither Mr Depp nor Ms Heard attended the hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Thursday.
At the hearing, Mr Depp’s legal professionals asked the court docket to recount about unusual evidence touching on to what they mentioned used to be Ms Heard’s order that she gave her seven million US buck (£5.5 million) divorce settlement to charity.
His barrister Andrew Caldecott QC told the court docket that order used to be a “calculated and manipulative lie”.
After the couple divorced in 2016, Ms Heard mentioned she would spoil up the seven million US greenbacks between the Teenagers’s Sanatorium Los Angeles and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
However, Mr Caldecott mentioned, the health heart wrote to Mr Depp’s replace adviser in 2019 to recount Ms Heard had now not made “any funds”.
The court docket heard she gave correct 100,000 greenbacks (£72,000) to the health heart and 450,000 greenbacks (£322,000) to the ACLU, though she claims she made a further 500,000-buck (£358,000) donation to the 2d charity anonymously.
Mr Caldecott mentioned the claims had given Ms Heard “a noteworthy boost to her credibility as a person”, and had “tipped the scales against Mr Depp from the very starting up”.
In November, Mr Justice Nicol rejected Mr Depp’s contention that Ms Heard used to be a “gold-digger”, asserting in his ruling: “Her donation of the seven million US greenbacks to charity is every so regularly the act one would seek data from of a gold-digger.”
However Mr Caldecott argued that if “the truth about the charity order emerged at the trial, it would have materially affected Mr Justice Nicol’s consideration of Ms Heard’s evidence as a complete”.
He mentioned the truth Ms Heard publicly donated her divorce settlement to charity used to be linked to “the likelihood of her being a victim of grave domestic violence”.
Mr Caldecott mentioned the donation used to be “a unconditionally mighty act of philanthropy, if correct”, adding it used to be additionally “a potent subliminal message: ‘I’d like him to pay, nevertheless I diagram now not need to wait on a dime of his money thanks to the system I in point of truth had been treated’”.
He told the court docket: “In the context of this case, it implies revulsion at the system he has treated her physically.”
Mr Caldecott additionally mentioned Mr Justice Nicol “had a extraordinarily the truth is helpful place to begin of Ms Heard” and “used to be now not in particular interested” in evidence unfavorable to her.
However Adam Wolanski QC, representing The Sun’s publisher Recordsdata Neighborhood Newspapers (NGN), mentioned the new evidence Mr Depp wanted to rely on “must now not have had any influence” on the consequence of the trial.
He mentioned the difficulty of donating the settlement to charity used to be handiest of relevance to “the so-referred to as ‘gold-digger’ thesis, and that used to be unnecessary to recount a thesis that used to be expressly abandoned by Mr Depp’s gorgeous team throughout the trial”.
Mr Wolanski added: “The labelling of Ms Heard as a gold-digger used to be a misogynistic trope. The gold-digger theory used to be hopeless.”
He additionally rejected Mr Depp’s contention that Ms Heard had lied about donating her divorce settlement to charity, asserting: “The recordsdata does now not hide that Ms Heard lied.”
Mr Wolanski added that Ms Heard had paid “in total, some 950,000 greenbacks to the ACLU and 850,000 greenbacks to the Teenagers’s Sanatorium Los Angeles”.
At the conclusion of Thursday’s hearing, Lord Justice Underhill – sitting with Lord Justice Dingemans – mentioned the court docket would give its ruling at a later date.
He mentioned: “We’re now not going to attain an instantaneous decision today… we’ll produce it very at this time.”
Mr Depp sued NGN in June 2018 over the column by The Sun’s govt editor Dan Wootton, which referred to “overwhelming evidence” he attacked Ms Heard.
In his judgment, Mr Justice Nicol concluded 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of domestic violence relied on by NGN in its defence of the actor’s order did occur.
The mediate additionally chanced on Mr Depp build Ms Heard in “bother for her life” on thrice, together with one the actress described as a “three-day hostage difficulty” in Australia in March 2015.
Correct days after the ruling in November, Mr Depp announced he had been asked by Warner Brothers to resign from his feature in the Harry Potter stir-off franchise Improbable Beasts – the very feature which precipitated Mr Wootton to quiz how JK Rowling could maybe be “essentially glad” Mr Depp used to be forged in the film.
Mr Depp is embroiled in a separate libel fight in the US, having sued Ms Heard for my half over a 2018 Washington Submit belief piece by which she claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse nevertheless didn’t point out the actor by name.
The actor’s 50 million buck (£35 million) US case against Ms Heard used to be honest now not too prolonged in the past delayed except April 2022.