Johnny Depp is seeking to appeal a Excessive Court ruling that he assaulted his ex-companion to promote his position in an impending US trial, lawyers representing the Sun newspaper contain claimed.
The actor is making a bid in the Court of Appeal to overturn the end result of a libel case against the tabloid, in which the determine chanced on that an April 2018 column calling Mr Depp a “companion beater” used to be “significantly moral”.
Following a 3-week trial in July closing year, Mr Justice Nicol dominated that Mr Depp, 57, assaulted Amber Heard, 34, on a dozen instances and assign her in “dismay for her lifestyles” three instances.
The actor claims he “didn’t obtain an even trial” and is applying for permission to appeal against the ruling at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Thursday.
Adam Wolanski QC, representing the Sun’s creator Information Community Newspapers (NGN), asked the court to reject the appeal, claiming he has brought the utility to “promote his position” in the US where he faces a separate libel battle.
Mr Depp is suing Ms Heard personally over a 2018 Washington Publish opinion share in which she claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse nevertheless didn’t point out the actor by title.
In written submissions, Mr Wolanski stated: “This court can infer that Mr Depp brings this wholly unmeritorious utility for permission to appeal a minimum of in share to promote his position in the US by continuing publicly to denigrate the supposedly ‘inequitable’ English prison direction of, a minimum of except after the US trial has concluded.”
He claimed Mr Depp had told his lawyers to publicly assault Mr Justice Nicol by saying his conclusions are “perverse”, “bewildering”, “troubling” and “ridiculous”.
Mr Wolanski rejected Mr Depp’s assertion that “unusual evidence exposes a calculated and manipulative lie” by Ms Heard in relation to donations made to charities together with her divorce settlement money.
After the couple divorced in 2016, Ms Heard stated she would split the seven million US greenbacks between the Formative years’s Medical institution Los Angeles (CHLA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Andrew Caldecott QC, for Mr Depp, told the Court of Appeal that she gave proper 100,000 greenbacks (£72,000) to the medical institution and 450,000 greenbacks (£322,000) to the ACLU, though she claims she made a further 500,000 greenback (£358,000) donation to the second charity anonymously.
He stated Mr Depp made an utility to rely on “unusual” evidence “because of paperwork becoming out there via some subpoenas in the US and via Ms Heard’s possess disclosure in the Virginia defamation action”.
Then again, lawyers for NGN stated Mr Depp could well contain obtained this evidence for the trial and pointed to instances where he tried to find out what came about to the donations.
In written submissions, Mr Wolanski QC stated: “The ask of whether or not Ms Heard had fulfilled her pledges to the two charities had been a preoccupation of the appellant (Mr Depp) since 2016, and had been a matter which his thoroughly-funded team of expert advisers had been very actively investigating well sooner than this trial began in July 2020.”
Mr Wolanski stated Mr Depp had “customarily left no stone unturned” to pursue the Excessive Court allege against NGN and that the actor’s prison prices on my own had been bigger than £2.4 million.
The barrister stated Mr Depp “or his prison or business advisers” knew from 2016 that Ms Heard’s donation could well be paid in instalments rather than a lump sum and “suspected that she would not invent the funds”.
He gave an example of a textual articulate material message the actor despatched to his nurse in August 2016 which referred to Ms Heard as a “scumbag gold-digger”.
The textual articulate material be taught: ““She won’t donate ONE PENNY!!!! Did you sight that it used to be a non disclosed charity??? She’s been pushing Artwork of Elysium for years!!!! And, what about battered ladies???
“No Method she’ll give a dime to anybody!!! Thank fshe’s gone!!!
“Makes me ailing to think of how onerous I tried to invent it work… Now… In reality, I wouldn’t touch that fing whore with a Hazmat suit on!!! What scum. I fing hate her!!!”
Mr Wolanski stated Mr Depp or his advisers had also asked questions about whether funds had been made and had asked Ms Heard to admit in the US proceedings against her that she had not donated the divorce settlement.
He stated Mr Depp had been despatched a letter in June 2019 by the teenagers’s medical institution which stated “since the first instalment, CHLA Foundation has not obtained further instalments”.
Mr Depp had also publicised the pain by tweeting there had been “7 million questions” to ask about Ms Heard’s donations and launched a enlighten to the media that there used to be a “whisk of unanswered questions” about Ms Heard’s relationship with the ACLU, Mr Wolanski stated.
“Against this background, it’s some distance ludicrous to indicate that the further evidence which the appellant now seeks to adduce couldn’t with life like diligence had been obtained sooner than the trial and that it merely ‘never took place’ to the appellant to substandard-examine Ms Heard about this pain,” they added.