Home Australia Sydney man accused of setting wife on fire

Sydney man accused of setting wife on fire

Sydney man accused of setting wife on fire

A Sydney woman heard a “loud blood-curdling” yowl sooner than seeing her neighbour engulfed in flames and her husband in the aid of her, his assassinate trial has been urged.

Kulwinder Singh poured petrol on his wife sooner than setting her alight after arguing over money, prosecutor Philip Hogan supposed to the jury in the crown opening address on Thursday.

Early Newspaper

Nonetheless Singh’s barrister, Margaret Cunneen SC, acknowledged Parwinder Kaur poured the petrol and position herself on fire to create a “drama”, confident the blaze would be put out.

“The crown case has no merit and Mr Singh is a thoroughly harmless man,” she urged the NSW Supreme Court docket jury.

Singh, 42, has pleaded no longer responsible to murdering his 32-year-aged wife on December 2, 2013, at their Rouse Hill residence

Mr Hogan acknowledged about 10 minutes sooner than the neighbour heard the yowl Ms Kaur called triple-zero.

In the decision played to the jury, she gave her address then acknowledged “my husband virtually killed me” sooner than the operator asked: “What did he conclude to you?”

Nonetheless there modified into no resolution and the decision modified into terminated.

The prosecutor acknowledged scientific proof indicated there modified into a interval of some minutes between the petrol being poured on Ms Kaur and it being position alight.

The Crown contended Singh position his wife on fire on account of money and monetary disputes including his requests for her to contribute to the mortgage and his unhappiness at her giving funds to her pupil brother.

On a talk over with to India, Singh allegedly urged his sister-in-law that if his wife wished a divorce he would no longer agree, announcing “we murder of us and nobody can discover”.

“That you just would possibly hear from contributors of Parwinder’s family that in the times sooner than her death she urged them she wished to win a divorce,” Mr Hogan acknowledged.

When police arrived at the residence, Singh acknowledged he had urged his wife if she wasn’t going to contribute money he modified into going to are dwelling at his mother’s residence.

“He acknowledged she got upset,” Mr Hogan acknowledged.

Singh acknowledged he modified into upstairs in the bedroom packing some garments when he heard his wife screaming.

He ran downstairs and seen her on the driveway on fire.

Nonetheless Mr Hogan contended Singh had poured petrol on his wife in the laundry and then frail a cigarette lighter realized on the bottom.

Ms Cunneen alleged Ms Kaur tragically died after maybe becoming frustrated about a lot of matters and deciding to “create a drama and to position fire to herself when she modified into confident it would possibly possibly soon be put out”.

“There would possibly be merely no forensic proof that helps the crown case,” she acknowledged.

“It all facets to the only rather a lot of possibility that, for her dangle reasons, she position herself on fire.”

Ten of her fingerprints have been realized on the petrol tin, but none of her husband’s and only her fingerprint modified into realized on the lighter in addition to only her DNA.

“There modified into no longer a skerrick of petrol” on his shirt, trousers or sandals though petrol traces have been realized on the laundry floor, she acknowledged.

Ms Kaur had very long hair, but this modified into unsinged despite most of her body being terribly burned.

“The defence case is she had protected her hair with a towel and neither her face nor her scalp have been burned.”

Ms Kaur ended a phone name in conjunction with her brother almost in the present day sooner than she rang triple zero, only announcing her husband modified into asking about money once more, Ms Cunneen acknowledged.

The trial continues sooner than Justice Natalie Adams.

Sydney man accused of setting wife on fire