Vanessa Bryant fires back against ‘tubby-scale assault’ by LA County in grisly photos case

CLOSE

USA TODAY draws back the curtain as four of its gain purchase covering the passing of Kobe Bryant and conducting his final interview ideal nine days prior.

USA TODAY

The widow of Kobe Bryant has “every pleasing” to find out how and why Los Angeles County authorities employees shared pictures of her unnecessary husband and daughter after they died in a helicopter smash final year, her authorized genuine acknowledged in a brand contemporary court docket filing this week.

That’s why she desires extra time to investigate the case and is fighting back against the county’s “tubby-scale assault” on her final week in court docket filings, the authorized genuine acknowledged.

The filing from Vanessa Bryant’s authorized genuine, Luis Li, comes in response to what county attorneys said about her final week as they pushed back against her lawsuit about the photos.

The county said in court docket documents then that her lawsuit had turned into a “fishing expedition” that became as soon as taking first responders away from their jobs and became as soon as subjecting them to harassment. The county also said the photos weren’t publicly disseminated, weren’t publicly posted on the internet and subsequently the widow of the NBA legend suffered no true damage to merit a lawsuit.

Her authorized genuine batted that back Monday.

KOBE BRYANT REMEMBERED: Particular coverage of a year after the lethal helicopter smash

“The discomfort and damage she has suffered from authorities personnel using graphic photos of her deceased family members as gossip fodder is terribly true,” said the filing in federal court docket. “The County’s downplaying of what took negate only confirms that Mrs. Bryant can’t trust the County’s internal investigations and must total an investigation of her gain.”

Bryant is suing L.A. County for negligence and invasion of privacy, accusing county sheriff and fireside division employees of improperly sharing grisly photos from the smash negate. Her lawsuit seeks to punish the deputy defendants and “style an example of them to the neighborhood.” The county has fought back by saying that only authorities personnel and one pal at a bar noticed the pictures in inquire of.

The back-and-forth court docket filings are piece of a dispute over the scope of her lawsuit and how considerable time she desires to be allowed to settle discovery proof in the case. The scheduled cutoff for such discovery proof is currently August. The county desires to follow that deadline.

However she desires to prolong that to February, saying the county has dragged its feet on her requests and that the misconduct is extra mammoth than she originally understood. She disputes the county’s claim that the misconduct involved a single isolated incident at a bar two days after the smash or that there became as soon as no “lurid titillation” involved by county public security employees.

A contain will contain in mind every arguments and make a resolution in coming weeks.

Her authorized genuine said the incidents they realized about are “nearly certainly ideal the tip of the iceberg” and that investigating the tubby extent of the photos’ unfold is time-intensive due to county personnel deleted photos.

“After one Sheriff’s deputy alone took between 25 and 100 photos of the scene and on the very least two (county fireside) personnel snapped even extra photos fascinated about the victims’ remains, the photos hasty made their blueprint into the palms of a huge quantity of County employees who had no involvement in investigating the accident, including a trainee monitoring the entry to a trailhead, a video-game buddy, and (a county fireside) media kin officer,” Li’s court docket filing acknowledged.  

Three other households whose family members died in the smash maintain filed the same complaints over the photos, including a brand contemporary swimsuit filed lately by the family of John, Keri and Alyssa Altobelli, who had been amongst the nine who perished in the accident.

The county has instructed Bryant is on a “scorched earth” leer information and said she subjected deputies to harassment after she posted four of their names on Instagram in March. Li’s filing took be concerned with this this and accused the county of “launching a tubby-scale assault on Mrs. Bryant for having the audacity to demand extra time to finish her investigation.”

“She has every pleasing to leer to support Defendants accountable for his or her actions and to file her lawsuit in the public report, as this Court expressly dominated,” his filing acknowledged. “And she or he has every pleasing to post a filing from the Court’s public docket on her inner most Instagram legend.”

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. E-mail: bschrotenb@usatoday.com